Just to remind myself:
Over the past 15 years the digitisation agenda for cultural heritage has been
shaped by a number of key policy statements, frameworks and funding calls. As well
as enabling major projects such as Europeana, these have informed shifting
understandings of the relationship between 'heritage' and 'the digital'. My
research is concerned with the influence of discourses of collective memory in
debates about digitisation and the preservation of cultural heritage. My thesis
explores the politics of this relationship further through analysis of the
projects, press and policies that have the digitisation of cultural heritage as
their goal, within major organisational and cultural
settings.
There are several areas of interest within this broader project
that are of interest. These
are:
* The Museum as Memory Institution: how large-scale digitisation
projects potentially re-define parameters between museums, libraries and
archives.
* Going beyond a notion of the digital object as a
supplement to but not a replacement for the physical object. Thinking about
digital objects in their own right, techniques for curation and
engagement.
* Search engine culture as a potential barrier to digital
heritage collections (i.e. you need to know what you're looking for in order to
find it).
The issue I've been working on recently is about approaches to
preserving digital objects, or more prescisely, the question of what to preserve
- not in terms of which artefact but which component of the digital object. For
example, the Science Museum takes an approach informed by the privileging of
material culture; even if you could view a digital object through running
software on some of their old models, they wouldn't risk turning it on since
there's a threat of fire or damage to the physical object. This issue forces us
to think about the format of intellectual content as a sort of performance (the
process by which it can be rendered and read or viewed). So potentially we're
preserving the performance of an object in digital culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment